Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 08:11
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sam Darnold on final games in Minnesota: "We laid an egg on offense" - NBC Sports
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
What would you do if you were lost at sea in the Florida Keys?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
The odd effects a year in space has on the bodies of astronauts - supercarblondie.com
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
What AI tool can be used to write exactly in the human writing style?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Russia can stop this any time.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Michael Altenhofen Is Leaving NASA HQ - NASA Watch
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
What’s next?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
'The Life of Chuck' Filmmaker Mike Flanagan on Stephen King Film - IndieWire
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Does meth make women super horny like it does men?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Thank you.
Just in the last 5 years:
What would be the lowest score with 9 strikes and no gutter balls?